Working practitioners across developer experience, AI tooling, higher education, and film. One lead instructor writes the curriculum and records every core lesson; four specialists record the deep dives.
All five courses
Developer Relations AI Engineer, San Francisco
Hackathon judge and AI content creator, and host of the AI Insights San Francisco podcast. Writes this curriculum and records every core lesson.
The bookWorld Models Applied in Video Production
Teach on this program
Every lesson here is recorded by somebody who runs the system they are teaching. That is the whole standard, and it is why the roster above is five people rather than fifty.
The bar is closer to an academic appointment than to a marketplace listing. The advisory board reads every application against it, and an intake that produces nobody at the bar closes with the seats still open rather than filling them.
Have your profile links and a portrait to hand before you start.
How to apply
Start with a free account, fill in the form at your own pace, and send it when it is ready. The advisory board reads every application that arrives.
Create your free account
The same account that opens the courses. Your application lives behind your own login because the second half of it asks for your photograph and your phone number, and those belong somewhere only you can post to.
Fill in the form
Your portrait, your profile links, the course you would record, and the evidence behind it. Every field saves as you go, so you can stop halfway and finish it another day.
Send it to the board
Add your phone, whether you can sit on a panel in person and in which city, and anything else worth knowing. Pressing send puts it in front of the advisory board, and the same page then shows you where it stands.
Every one of these is something a stranger can check for themselves, which is the standard the rest of this site holds itself to.
Stated before you apply rather than after you are accepted. A seat is a commitment across a whole term.
Advisory board
Applications to teach and applications to judge are read by the advisory board, not by the person who wrote the curriculum. Advisors hold no course and no seat here. They are operators and investors from outside the program, and what they read is the evidence rather than the name on it.
Everything in one file
Your evidence, your links, your portrait and how to reach you, sent from inside your account rather than emailed around.
Read against the bar, not against the field
Your application is measured against what the seat requires, so a strong intake keeps the bar where it is and a thin one keeps it there too.
A conversation, if it gets that far
Anyone the board is seriously considering talks to an advisor, and for a teaching seat that includes watching you explain one thing you built.
An answer either way
The page you applied from shows where your application stands, and it changes the day the board decides.
Advisor and angel investor across climate tech, regenerative agriculture and talent tech
